Infrastructure

Systems architecture, self-hosting, deployment patterns, and operational resilience.

3 papers·July 2026
01

Self-Hosting Is Not a Feature, It Is Infrastructure

TELOSIS-RP-2026-001·July 2026

The decision to self-host core infrastructure is frequently treated as an optional capability, a box to check during procurement or a bullet point on a feature comparison sheet. This framing is fundamentally mistaken. Self-hosting is not a feature that can be bolted onto an otherwise dependent stack; it is a foundational architectural commitment that shapes every downstream decision, from data governance to operational resilience. This paper examines three model organizations that migrated from managed services to self-hosted infrastructure, documenting the full cost profile, the decision frameworks that guided the transition, and the operational patterns that emerged post-migration. We find that self-hosting reduces long-term operational risk only when treated as infrastructure: budgeted, staffed, and governed with the same rigor applied to networking or physical security. Teams that treat self-hosting as a feature, deployed opportunistically without sustained investment, experience higher failure rates and worse cost outcomes than those that remained on managed services.

Read paper →
02

Distributed Execution Models: A Comparative Analysis

TELOSIS-RP-2026-002·July 2026

Modern software systems increasingly depend on distributed execution to handle scale, reliability, and fault tolerance. Yet the choice of execution model is often made implicitly - inherited from existing infrastructure or selected based on familiarity rather than analysis. This paper examines five execution architectures: queue-based, event stream, work pool, orchestrated, and direct execution. For each, we evaluate reliability, latency, fault tolerance, operational complexity, and appropriate use cases. We provide a decision framework for selecting an execution model based on system requirements rather than convention.

Read paper →
03

WebRTC Infrastructure at Scale

TELOSIS-RP-2026-003·July 2026

WebRTC enables peer-to-peer communication between browsers and devices without plugins or third-party software. But its promise of direct connection belies significant infrastructure complexity. This paper examines the three pillars of WebRTC infrastructure at scale: signaling architecture, NAT traversal strategies, and TURN fallback design. We present latency benchmarks from production systems, document common failure modes, and provide architectural patterns drawn from the development of Relay, a WebRTC signaling and relay infrastructure built by CODECX.

Read paper →